6/4/08

BBC News about Greece's veto: Nato Macedonia veto stokes tension


(By Oana Lungescu BBC European affairs correspondent, Bucharest)

When they chose Bucharest as the venue for their 2008 summit, Nato leaders meant to send an encouraging signal to all Balkan countries.
But the decision not to invite Macedonia along with Croatia and Albania risks sending mixed signals and raising fears of instability in a region which was already reeling from Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia.
Macedonia's bid was blocked by Greece because of a 17-year row over the country's name. Athens says it implies a territorial claim on its northern province - also called Macedonia - and wants the former Yugoslav republic to change its name to New or Upper Macedonia.
But the veto has only inflamed nationalist feelings.
In a gesture rarely seen at a Nato summit, a group of Macedonian journalists angrily walked out of a news conference after Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer made the announcement.

Shortly afterwards, the entire Macedonian delegation left the summit, arguing that the country's leaders had to be with their people at a difficult moment.
Striking a defiant note, foreign minister Antonio Milososki said: "It is very regretful for the principles of democracy that Macedonia's bid for Nato membership was punished, not because of what we have done but because of who we are. We are Macedonians and our country is the Republic of Macedonia. And it will remain so forever."
Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha thanked Nato leaders for the invitation to join, which he called "a miracle".
But he warned that the failure to issue a similar invitation to Macedonia - where a quarter of the country's two million people are ethnic Albanians - could encourage "radical groups".
In 2001, Nato and the EU managed to prevent a civil war in Macedonia between security forces and ethnic Albanians separatists by brokering a peace deal which granted more minority rights.
But there will be fewer incentives for the government to create a multi-ethnic society without the carrot of Nato and European Union membership. Athens could use its veto again later this year to scupper Skopje's bid to start EU membership talks.


Pessimists fear that Macedonia could break up under the strain, reviving dreams of a Greater Albania including Kosovo. Optimists argue Albania's invitation to join Nato will help to prevent the worst-case scenario.

"I feel sorry because Nato membership is important for Macedonia's political stability," said former Serbian foreign minister Goran Svilanovic, "but I'm also thinking about Serbia's interest. Every progress of Serbia's neighbours towards EU and Nato membership is good because it should encourage Serbia's people and politicians to achieve the same goals."
But Kosovo's secession has pushed Serbia further away from the rest of Europe, with pro-Western forces lagging behind nationalist parties ahead of next month's parliamentary election.
There was little reaction to Nato's offer of an "intensified dialogue", which was granted to Bosnia and Montenegro as a key step towards eventual membership. All former communist countries that are now part of the EU boosted their democratic credentials by first joining Nato.
Slovenia is already part of Nato and the EU. Almost two decades after the bloody break-up of Yugoslavia, Croatia also looks close to reaching that goal. It hopes to join Nato next year and the EU by 2010.
On Friday, US President George W Bush travels to Zagreb to congratulate Croatians on their success.
Only two months ago, they did not seem at all keen on Nato. But with Serbian nationalism once again on the rise, Croatians have made their choice. Prime Minister Ivo Sanader said support for Nato membership now stood at 70%.

Eurobarometer: attitudes of European citizens towards the environment

If you would like to learn about the attitudes of European citizens about the environment, visit the link and read the report, which includes very interesting statistical information supported by simple, descriptive and comprehensive graphical representations.
The survey was requested by Directorate General Environment and coordinated by Directorate
General Communication.

Audiovisual service: sharing the sights and sounds of Europe

Would you like to have a look at the photos provided by the European Commission? You can search, view and find the EU photos you are interested in... Just visit the link!

EUTube: sharing the soights and sounds of Europe

Have a look at the link offered and watch videos about the EU, it's a good practice for your language skills!

About passport-free travelling...

Frontier-free travel for countries which joined the EU in 2004 became a reality in December.
The highly symbolic removal of remaining East–West border checks means that citizens in the ‘new’ member countries now enjoy passport-free travel across the EU, less than four years after joining. It was timed to take effect before Christmas, making travel easier over the holiday period, especially for those working elsewhere in the Union.
The new rules cover travel by land and sea. Border checks at airports for EU internal flights will be removed by the end of March 2008.
The rules do not yet apply to
Bulgaria and Romania, which joined the EU in January 2007, or to Cyprus.
The counterpart of internal freedom to travel is tough controls at the EU’s external frontiers and closer security cooperation among national authorities. Existing procedures and systems to track criminals and terrorists under the so-called
Schengen Agreement have therefore been extended to the countries concerned: the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia.
The area of frontier-free travel includes non-EU members Iceland and Norway. While the United Kingdom and Ireland belong or will belong to the Schengen system of police and judicial cooperation, they have opted to retain border controls for all travellers entering their territory
.

Democracy-Dialogue-Debate

Help give direction to the future of Europe. Join in any number of debates and give us your views on the challenges facing Europe today.
Do you think it's going in the right direction? Are the institutions making a difference where it really counts? Are they being overly meddlesome in trivial areas and not meddlesome enough in others, such as securing jobs and protecting consumers? Where do you stand on the climate change debate?
Where do you see Europe's borders ending? Take this opportunity to play your part in defining the road ahead. Just visit the link and join the forum...